Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics

Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics, HLT-362V-RS5 ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOM, PLAGIARISM-FREE PAPERS ON Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Search the GCU Library and find one new health care article that uses quantitative research. Do not use an article from a previous assignment, or that appears in the Topic Materials or textbook. Complete an article analysis and ethics evaluation of the research using the “Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics” template. See Chapter 5 of your textbook as needed, for assistance. While APA style is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and documentation of sources should be presented using APA formatting guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion. You are required to submit this assignment to LopesWrite. Refer to the LopesWrite Technical Support articles for assistance. Attachments HLT-362V-RS5-ArticleAnalysisEthicalEval-Template.docx RUBRIC Attempt Start Date: 30-Nov-2020 at 12:00:00 AM Due Date: 06-Dec-2020 at 11:59:59 PM Maximum Points: 140.0 Applied Statistics for Health Care Read Chapter 5 in Applied Statistics for Health Care. URL: https://www.gcumedia.com/digital-resources/grand-canyon-university/2018/applied-statistics-for-health-care_1e.php Excel for Windows Training Review the “Excel for Windows Training” modules, located on the Microsoft Office website, and use them as resources for the Summary and Descriptive Data assignment, as needed. URL: https://support.office.com/en-us/article/excel-for-windows-training-9bc05390-e94c-46af-a5b3-d7c22f6990bb The Visual Learner: Statistics Refer to the “Visual Learner: Statistics” to learn more about the statistical calculations presented in this topic. URL: http://lc.gcumedia.com/hlt362v/the-visual-learner/the-visual-learner-v2.1.html Ethics in Medical Research and Publication Read “Ethics in Medical Research and Publication,” by Masic, Hodzic, and Mulic, from International Journal of Preventative Medicine (2014). URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4192767/ Chapter 2. Health Databases and Health Database Organizations: Uses, Benefits, and Concerns Read “Chapter 2. Health Databases and Health Database Organizations: Uses, Benefits, and Concerns,” by Donaldson and Lohr, from the online eBook, Health Data in the Information Age: Use, Discloser, and Privacy (1994), available on the National Center for Biotechnology Information (NCBI) website. URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK236556/ Using Epidemiological Data to Guide Clinical Practice: Review of Studies on Cardiovascular Disease and Use of Combined Oral Contraceptives Read “Using Epidemiological Data to Guide Clinical Practice: Review of Studies on Cardiovascular Disease and Use of Combined Oral Contraceptives,” by Hannaford and Owen-Smith, from BMJ (1998). URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC28503/ Secondary Data Analysis: Ethical Issues and Challenges Read “Secondary Data Analysis: Ethical Issues and Challenges,” by Tripathy, from Iranian Journal of Public Health (2013). URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4441947/ What Are the Major Ethical Issues in Conducting Research? Is There a Conflict Between the Research Ethics and the Nature of Nursing? Read “What Are the Major Ethical Issues in Conducting Research? Is There a Conflict Between the Research Ethics and the Nature of Nursing?” by Fouka and Mantzorou, from Health Scinece Journal (2011). URL: http://www.hsj.gr/medicine/what-are-the-major-ethical-issues-in-conducting-research-is-there-a-conflict-between-the-research-ethics-and-the-nature-of-nursing.php?aid=3485 Ethical Challenges of Researchers in Qualitative Studies: The Necessity to Develop a Specific Guideline Read “Ethical Challenges of Researchers in Qualitative Studies: The Necessity to Develop a Specific Guideline,” by Sanjari, Bahramnezhad, Fomani, Shoghi, and Cheraghi, from Journal of Medical Ethics and History of Medicine (2014). URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4263394/ Challenges in Conducting Qualitative Research in Health: A Conceptual Paper Read “Challenges in Conducting Qualitative Research in Health: A Conceptual Paper,” by Khankeh, Ranjbar, Khorasani-Zavareh, Zargham-Boroujeni, and Johansson, from Iranian Journal of Nursing and Midwifery Research (2015). URL: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC4700679/ Rubric Course Code Class Code Assignment Title Total Points HLT-362V HLT-362V-O502 Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics 140.0 Criteria Percentage 1: Unsatisfactory (0.00%) 2: Less Than Satisfactory (65.00%) 3: Satisfactory (75.00%) 4: Good (85.00%) 5: Excellent (100.00%) Comments Points Earned Content 100.0% Article (Quantitative, APA Citation and Permalink) 5.0% The article presented does not use quantitative research. N/A N/A N/A The article presented is based on quantitative research. Article Citation and Permalink 5.0% Article citation and permalink are omitted. Article citation and permalink are presented. There are significant errors. Page numbers are not indicated to cite information, or the page numbers are incorrect. Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is presented in APA format, but there are errors. Page numbers to cite information are missing, or incorrect, in some areas. Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is presented in APA format. Page numbers are used in to cite information. There are minor errors. Article citation and permalink are presented. Article citation is accurately presented in APA format. Page numbers are accurate and used in all areas when citing information. Broad Topic Area/Title 5.0% Broad topic area and title are omitted. Broad topic area and title are referenced but are incomplete. Broad topic area and title are summarized. There are inaccuracies. Broad topic area and title are presented. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies. Broad topic area and title are fully presented and accurate. Problem Statement 5.0% Problem statement is omitted or incorrect. Problem statement is referenced but is incomplete. Problem statement is partially presented. There are inaccuracies. Problem statement is summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies. Problem statement is accurate and clearly summarized. Purpose Statement 5.0% Purpose statement is omitted or incorrect. Purpose statement is referenced but is incomplete. Purpose statement is partially presented. There are inaccuracies. Purpose statement is summarized. There are some minor inaccuracies. Purpose statement is accurate and clearly summarized. Research Questions 5.0% Research questions are omitted or incorrect. Research questions are partially presented. N/A N/A Research questions are presented and accurate. Define Hypothesis (Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used.) 5.0% Definition of hypothesis is omitted. The definition of the hypothesis is incorrect. Hypothesis is summarized. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies. Hypothesis is defined. Hypothesis is generally defined. There are some minor inaccuracies. Hypothesis is accurate and clearly defined Identify Variables and Type of Data for Variables 5.0% Variable type and data for variable are omitted. Variable type and data for variable are presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Variable type and data for variable are presented. There are inaccuracies. Variable type and data for variable are presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Variable type and data for variable are presented and accurate. Population of Interest for Study 5.0% Population of interest for the study is omitted. Population of interest for the study is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Population of interest for the study is presented. There are inaccuracies. Population of interest for the study is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Population of interest for the study is presented and accurate. Sample 5.0% Sample is omitted. Sample is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Sample is presented. There are inaccuracies. Sample is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided. Sample is presented and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided. Sampling Method 5.0% Sampling method is omitted. Sampling method is presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Sampling method is presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted. Sampling method is presented. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Sampling method is presented and accurate. Identify Data Collection 5.0% How data were collected is not identified. How data were collected is presented but is incorrect. How data were collected is partially presented. There are inaccuracies or omissions. How data were collected is identified. There are minor inaccuracies How data were collected is fully identified and accurate. Summary of Data Collection Approach 5.0% The means of data collection are omitted. The means of data collection are referenced. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. The means of data collection are presented. There are inaccuracies. Page citation for sample information is omitted. The means of data collection are summarized. Minor detail is needed for accuracy. Page citation for sample information is provided. The means of data collection are thoroughly summarized and accurate. Page citation for sample information is provided. Data Analysis 5.0% Data analysis is omitted. Data analysis is incomplete. Not all types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. The types of statistical tests listed are incorrect or unrelated to the variables indicated. Data analysis is summarized. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. There are inaccuracies or omissions. Data analysis is generally discussed. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are indicated. There minor inaccuracies. Data analysis is discussed. Types of statistical tests used for the variables are all indicated and accurate. Summary Results of Study 5.0% Summary of the results of the study is omitted or incorrect. The results of the study are partially presented. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. More information is needed. The results of study are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. Some information or rationale is needed for support. The results of study are summarized. Minor detail or information is needed for accuracy or clarity. The results of study are well summarized. The summary is accurate and clearly represents the results of the study. Summary Assumptions and Limitations 10.0% Identification of assumptions and limitations by the author is omitted. Summary of potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author is omitted or not relevant to the study. Some assumptions and limitations from the article are identified. Other potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are partially presented. Significant information is needed. Most assumptions and limitations from the article are identified. Other potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. There are some inaccuracies. More information or rationale is needed for support. Assumptions and limitations from the article are identified and accurate. Potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. Some information or rationale is needed for support. Assumptions and limitations from the article are identified and accurate. Potential assumptions and limitations not listed by the author are summarized. Strong rationale is provided to support summary. Summary of Ethical Considerations 10.0% Summary of ethical considerations is omitted. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are incomplete. There are major inaccuracies or omissions. Significant information and rationale are needed to support summary. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are presented. There are some inaccuracies. Some information and rationale are needed to support summary. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are summarized. The ethical considerations summarized are reasonable. Some rationale or evidence are needed to support summary. Ethical considerations related to sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, and publishing results are clearly summarized. The ethical considerations summarized are reasonable. Strong rationale and support are provided. Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, and language use) 5.0% Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice or sentence construction is employed. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register) or word choice are present. Sentence structure is correct but not varied. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but they are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct and varied sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are employed. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. The writer uses a variety of effective sentence structures and figures of speech. The writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English. Total Weightage 100% Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Template Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Article Citation and Permalink (APA format) Article 1 Point Description Broad Topic Area/Title Problem Statement (What is the problem research is addressing?) Purpose Statement (What is the purpose of the study?) Research Questions (What questions does the research seek to answer?) Define Hypothesis (Or state the correct hypothesis based upon variables used) Identify Dependent and Independent Variables and Type of Data for the Variables Population of Interest for Study Sample Sampling Method Identify Data Collection Identify how data were collected Summarize Data Collection Approach Discuss Data Analysis Include what types of statistical tests were used for the variables. Summarize Results of Study Summary of Assumptions and Limitations Identify the assumptions and limitations from the article. Report other potential assumptions and limitations of your review not listed by the author. Ethical Considerations Evaluate the article and identify potential ethical considerations that may have occurred when sampling, collecting data, analyzing data, or publishing results. Summarize your findings below in 250-500 words. Provide rationale and support for your evaluation. Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10

Struggling to find relevant content? Order a custom essay on
Article Analysis and Evaluation of Research Ethics
Let our experts save you the hassle
Order Now
Calculate the price
Make an order in advance and get the best price
Pages (550 words)
$0.00
*Price with a welcome 15% discount applied.
Pro tip: If you want to save more money and pay the lowest price, you need to set a more extended deadline.
We know how difficult it is to be a student these days. That's why our prices are one of the most affordable on the market, and there are no hidden fees.

Instead, we offer bonuses, discounts, and free services to make your experience outstanding.
Sign up, place your order, and leave the rest to our professional paper writers in less than 2 minutes.
step 1
Upload assignment instructions
Fill out the order form and provide paper details. You can even attach screenshots or add additional instructions later. If something is not clear or missing, the writer will contact you for clarification.
s
Get personalized services with GPA Fix
One writer for all your papers
You can select one writer for all your papers. This option enhances the consistency in the quality of your assignments. Select your preferred writer from the list of writers who have handledf your previous assignments
Same paper from different writers
Are you ordering the same assignment for a friend? You can get the same paper from different writers. The goal is to produce 100% unique and original papers
Copy of sources used
Our homework writers will provide you with copies of sources used on your request. Just add the option when plaing your order
What our partners say about us
We appreciate every review and are always looking for ways to grow. See what other students think about our do my paper service.
ENG 099
Excellent Paper. The only 100 in the class.
Customer 452775, July 19th, 2022
Education
Thank you so much for all the help, I really appreciate it!
Customer 452631, November 3rd, 2021
Nursing
Always on time and a life saver for sure!!!!!!!!!!!!
Customer 452453, October 22nd, 2021
Other
NICE
Customer 452813, June 30th, 2022
Criminal Justice
Looks good! Thank you Jason
Customer 452711, January 25th, 2022
Nursing
Awesome work!!!!!!
Customer 452453, March 24th, 2021
Nursing
Paid for the paper to be completed 5 days prior than the day I received the paper.
Customer 452693, July 13th, 2022
Nursing
Fantastic work on this project as usual.
Customer 452707, July 5th, 2022
ENVIRONMENT SCIENCE
great
Customer 452813, June 26th, 2022
Other
Thank you for a well written paper!!!
Customer 452557, January 19th, 2022
Social Work and Human Services
Thank You, Don!!! :)
Customer 452587, November 9th, 2021
Other
GOOD
Customer 452813, July 10th, 2022
OUR GIFT TO YOU
15% OFF your first order
Use a coupon FIRST15 and enjoy expert help with any task at the most affordable price.
Claim my 15% OFF Order in Chat
error: Content is protected !!

Save More. Score Better. Use coupon code SPECIAL for a 15%discount