A Peek into the Future
original assignment: You are to argue the question in the prompt below. You are to use Rogerian Argument structure: logical claims required. All evidence should come from Primary or Secondary sources. Use class texts both required and suggested as well as other research from good authority. MLA citations in-text and a Works Cited page are required. Note: If more research is done in doing this paper but not cited include a Bibliography. Prompt : Question: In The Future of Humanity, Kaku looks at the changes humanity may need to make or will make in the future. Kelly in his work Inevitable argues that future trends and technology are inevitable. And, Ross offers a peek into The Industries of the Future. All authors are optimistic, but they, too, present possible problems all this technology may bring about. Does it matter how we set up the future for fifty or one hundred years from nowor should we worry about the problems of our lifetime? Take a side: We need to start designing our future/ or/ we need to worry about todays needs instead. Paper: 100 pts. Length of 5-6 pages. The essay will be largely graded on use of the structure as given in the class. Professor comments/Rewrite instruction: The low score was caused from: No thesis written as Warrant, Refutes to your Essay Claim Go back and look at the structure needed for your thesis in PAGES with writing a Rogerian Structure Also Ken, there is no specific audience for your paper. Define your audience: Audience: US Congress Topic: We need to plan for the future when it comes to the subject of __________________ more than worry about today’s needs. Opposition : Those who state we need to worry about today’s needs when it comes to ________________ Offer Three Position: Your position against those three….planning for the future when it comes to__________. Your positions will be opposite those of the opposition. Reference material: https://youtu.be/vHzxhqquq7M Most importantly, please switch this to Rogerian Structure. Thanks
