[Get Solution] Criminal Law

Final Exam Summer 2020   Please refer to the grading rubric for this exam that is posted on Canvas.        1.     Describe Terry Vs Ohio.  Why is this case considered to be a landmark case?  What is stop in frisk and how is that different from a Terry stop?  Is the practice of stop and frisk unconstitutional?                  2.     Describe Miranda Vs Arizona.  Why is this case considered to be a landmark case?  Do career convicted felons necessarily need Miranda read during questioning due to past experience base on the assumption they know their rights due to past experiences?  Research a case in which evidence was used without Miranda being used during questioning.              3.     Explain what a hate crime is.  Provide an example and also please describe the difficulty in identifying the difference between a hate crime and a traditional crime.  For example, differentiating between an assault and battery vs an assault and battery that is a hate crime.         4.     Outline the ACLU vs Alvarez case.  Provide in detail your opinion of citizens should be able to audio record police officers in a public space?  Do police officers have the same protections to privacy during the course of their duty the same as non-law enforcement citizens do during the course of their work?                  5.     Discuss the following issues regarding freedom of speech.  What is slander and liable, provide an example.  What are your thoughts on flag burning, should that be covered under symbolic speech or is the “act” one that could be considered seditious or treasonous and should not be protected.