Discussion: importance of critically appraising research evidence

Discussion: importance of critically appraising research evidence ORDER NOW FOR CUSTOMIZED AND ORIGINAL ESSAY PAPERS ON Discussion: importance of critically appraising research evidence This one is a doozey and i hope anyone can help with it. Discussion: importance of critically appraising research evidence Its a 2 part question: Part A (Single or double spaced in landscape orientation): Critical Appraisal of Research. Conduct a critical appraisal of the four peer-reviewed articles you selected and analyzed by completing the Evaluation Table within the Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template (Critical Appraisal Evaluation Table Tool Worksheet Template attached doc). The peer reviewed used include: -Arslanta?, H., Adana, F., Ergin, F. A., Kayar, D., & Acar, G. (2015). Loneliness in elderly people, associated factors and its correlation with quality of life: A field study from Western Turkey. Iranian journal of public health, 44(1), 43. -Donovan, N. J., Wu, Q., Rentz, D. M., Sperling, R. A., Marshall, G. A., & Glymour, M. M. (2017). Loneliness, depression and cognitive function in older US adults. International journal of geriatric psychiatry, 32(5), 564-573. -Gilbert, P. (2016). Depression: The evolution of powerlessness. Routledge. For Part B (1-2 pages, in po rtrait orientation) : Critical Appraisal of Research. Based on your appraisal, in a 1-2-page critical appraisal, suggest a best practice that emerges from the research you reviewed. Briefly explain the best practice, justifying your proposal with APA citations of the research; Title Page Introductory paragraph. State the purpose of the paper in the last sentence. Critical appraisal (see assignment requirements Conclusion References I hope i gave enough information but if not let me know. Thanks usw1_nurs_6052_criticalappraisaltool Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template Evaluation Table Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Full APA formatted citation of selected article. Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Evidence Level * (I, II, or III) Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study ( If there is not one mentioned in the article, say that here ).** Design/Method Describe the design and how the study was carried out (In detail, including inclusion/exclusion criteria). Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc. Major Variables Studied List and define dependent and independent variables. Discussion: importance of critically appraising research evidence Measurement Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions ( You need to list the actual tests done ). Data Analysis Statistical or Qualitative findings ( You need to enter the actual numbers determined by the statistical tests or qualitative data ). Findings and Recommendations General findings and recommendations of the research Appraisal and Study Quality Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of use in your practice? Key findings Outcomes General Notes/Comments * These levels are from the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Evidence Level and Quality Guide Level I Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis Level II Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis Level III Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis Level IV Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence Level V Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence **Note on Conceptual Framework The following information is from Walden academic guides which helps explain conceptual frameworks and the reasons they are used in research. Here is the link https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework Researchers create theoretical and conceptual frameworks that include a philosophical and methodological model to help design their work. A formal theory provides context for the outcome of the events conducted in the research. The data collection and analysis are also based on the theoretical and conceptual framework. Discussion: importance of critically appraising research evidence As stated by Grant and Osanloo (2014), “Without a theoretical framework, the structure and vision for a study is unclear, much like a house that cannot be constructed without a blueprint. By contrast, a research plan that contains a theoretical framework allows the dissertation study to be strong and structured with an organized flow from one chapter to the next.” Theoretical and conceptual frameworks provide evidence of academic standards and procedure. They also offer an explanation of why the study is pertinent and how the researcher expects to fill the gap in the literature. Literature does not always clearly delineate between a theoretical or conceptual framework. With that being said, there are slight differences between the two. References The Johns Hopkins Hospital/Johns Hopkins University (n.d.). Johns Hopkins nursing dvidence-based practice: appendix C: evidence level and quality guide. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/_docs/appendix_c_evidence_level_quality_guide.pdf Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for Your” House”. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4 (2), 12-26. Walden University Academic Guides (n.d.). Conceptual & theoretical frameworks overview. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework Critical Appraisal Tool Worksheet Template Evaluation Table Use this document to complete the evaluation table requirement of the Module 4 Assessment, Evidence-Based Project, Part 4A: Critical Appraisal of Research Full APA formatted citation of selected article. Article #1 Article #2 Article #3 Article #4 Evidence Level * (I, II, or III) Conceptual Framework Describe the theoretical basis for the study ( If there is not one mentioned in the article, say that here ).** Design/Method Describe the design and how the study was carried out (In detail, including inclusion/exclusion criteria). Sample/Setting The number and characteristics of patients, attrition rate, etc. Major Variables Studied List and define dependent and independent variables Measurement Identify primary statistics used to answer clinical questions ( You need to list the actual tests done ). Data Analysis Statistical or Qualitative findings ( You need to enter the actual numbers determined by the statistical tests or qualitative data ). Findings and Recommendations General findings and recommendations of the research Appraisal and Study Quality Describe the general worth of this research to practice. What are the strengths and limitations of study? What are the risks associated with implementation of the suggested practices or processes detailed in the research? What is the feasibility of use in your practice? Key findings Outcomes General Notes/Comments * These levels are from the Johns Hopkins Nursing Evidence-Based Practice: Evidence Level and Quality Guide Level I Experimental, randomized controlled trial (RCT), systematic review RTCs with or without meta-analysis Level II Quasi-experimental studies, systematic review of a combination of RCTs and quasi-experimental studies, or quasi-experimental studies only, with or without meta-analysis Level III Nonexperimental, systematic review of RCTs, quasi-experimental with/without meta-analysis, qualitative, qualitative systematic review with/without meta-synthesis Level IV Respected authorities’ opinions, nationally recognized expert committee/consensus panel reports based on scientific evidence Level V Literature reviews, quality improvement, program evaluation, financial evaluation, case reports, nationally recognized expert(s) opinion based on experiential evidence **Note on Conceptual Framework The following information is from Walden academic guides which helps explain conceptual frameworks and the reasons they are used in research. Here is the link https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework Researchers create theoretical and conceptual frameworks that include a philosophical and methodological model to help design their work. A formal theory provides context for the outcome of the events conducted in the research. The data collection and analysis are also based on the theoretical and conceptual framework. As stated by Grant and Osanloo (2014), “Without a theoretical framework, the structure and vision for a study is unclear, much like a house that cannot be constructed without a blueprint. By contrast, a research plan that contains a theoretical framework allows the dissertation study to be strong and structured with an organized flow from one chapter to the next.” Theoretical and conceptual frameworks provide evidence of academic standards and procedure. They also offer an explanation of why the study is pertinent and how the researcher expects to fill the gap in the literature. Literature does not always clearly delineate between a theoretical or conceptual framework. With that being said, there are slight differences between the two. Discussion: importance of critically appraising research evidence References The Johns Hopkins Hospital/Johns Hopkins University (n.d.). Johns Hopkins nursing dvidence-based practice: appendix C: evidence level and quality guide. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://www.hopkinsmedicine.org/evidence-based-practice/_docs/appendix_c_evidence_level_quality_guide.pdf Grant, C., & Osanloo, A. (2014). Understanding, Selecting, and Integrating a Theoretical Framework in Dissertation Research: Creating the Blueprint for Your” House”. Administrative Issues Journal: Education, Practice, and Research, 4 (2), 12-26. Walden University Academic Guides (n.d.). Conceptual & theoretical frameworks overview. Retrieved October 23, 2019 from https://academicguides.waldenu.edu/library/conceptualframework Get a 10 % discount on an order above $ 100 Use the following coupon code : NURSING10