International Theory
Write a 1000 word review of Stephen Krasners and Cynthia Enloes contributions in Smith, Booth & Zalewski (eds.) International Theory: Positivism and Beyond, pp. 108-27, 186-202. In your review, please make sure you address the following: How do Krasners and Enloes definitions of the political differ? How would you relate their competing definitions of the political to contrasting research methods and technique? Reflecting on Krasners and Enloes arguments, do you think that political phenomena can be objectively understood, or do they tend to be open to different interpretations?
RECOMMENDED: [SOLVED] Realism and International Theory